I really enjoyed this class! The part I liked the best was how we watched films and then chose what we wanted to write about. This gave us a bit more freedom than being told exactly what to write. It was interesting to see the topics that fellow classmates came up with. It just goes to show how each person interprets things in their own way. I also enjoyed the movies that where chosen for us to watch. I found them all interesting!
I found the peer critiques to be helpful as well. Sometimes it takes a second (or even third) pair of eyes to catch something we may have missed, even when we read our drafts over and over again! My only suggestion for this area would be to maybe change the groups up more often. I would have liked to read the papers of more than just the few classmates I did get to critique. It is always nice to be exposed to other ideas and ways of writing.
Other than that, I feel that the class went very smoothly. I had fun! I wish I had taken you for ENC1101, as I found the teacher I had to be quite boring...
Friday, April 26, 2013
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Education Essay
What
Could Tenure Be?
It is no great mystery that America’s education system is
severely flawed. While there are many issues and problems that plague the world
of education, such as under-paid and over-worked teachers, the issue that
really strikes a nerve with many is that of tenure. Tenure has not always had a
bad rap. The word tenure comes from the Latin tenere, meaning “to hold” or “to
keep” and was created in 1866 with the original purpose of protecting educators
from losing their jobs for arbitrary reasons (Chesley). Since its beginning,
however, the overall perception and understanding of tenure for teachers has
been skewed. The problems associated with tenure, however, could be solved if
several steps are taken. Principals could avoid giving tenure to undeserving teachers
by following such guidelines as more meaningful evaluations for new teachers,
ensuring more involvement by teachers in not only their classrooms, but also
their communities, and finally, providing better guidance and intervention for
those struggling during their early years (Chesley).
The process of evaluating workers on their job
performance is not a new concept. Many companies routinely evaluate and track
the achievement of employees in the workforce, and make adjustments
accordingly. The idea that teachers should be evaluated is also not new. While
most teachers are evaluated and tracked, the problem comes when the
administration gets lazy. Since the guidelines for measuring the effectiveness
of teachers will vary from state to state, it is up to the schools to make sure
that the teachers are performing at their very best (Marshall). In an article
by Patricia Marshall, which reviewed the tenure policies and related resources in
ten states, she discovered that many administrators use a
“classroom-teaching-performance check list” which fails to measure such things
as the teacher’s “reasoned commitment to the education profession” (Marshall). This
should be changed. Although it is important to evaluate teachers on their
ability to educate the students, it should also be taken into account the way
they feel about their jobs and how much they strive to improve themselves on a
daily basis.
For
those individuals planning to enter the world of teaching, it would serve them
well to be actively involved in their communities. Teaching should reach far
beyond the classroom and day to day instruction. Teachers, both new and those
with much experience, should all work together to foster learning in their
classrooms and communities. Some ways to become more involved would be to hold
open houses, allow for many parent teacher conferences, as well as volunteering
in the surrounding community. According to a NEA policy brief,
“Parent,
family, and community involvement in education correlates with higher academic
performance and school improvement. When schools, parents, families, and
communities work together to support learning, students tend to earn higher
grades, attend school more regularly, stay in school longer, and enroll in higher
level programs” (NEA).
Not
only does community involvement help the students, but it can also help the
teachers feel that that are a part of something bigger. Principals and other
administrators in charge of granting tenure should take into consideration a
teacher’s involvement and overall feelings toward the community in which they
work and live.
Teaching is a scary profession. It
is perhaps most terrifying in the first few years. New teachers are thrown into
a world in which they are given the task of shaping young minds and building
the future of this country. What could be more intimidating? “So well-known is
the hectic nature of the early period in a teachers career that it is commonly
referred to as the “survival stage” (Marshall). That being said, many may find
it unfair to judge teachers during their first few years on the job and use
those judgments to determine their eligibility for tenure. An article published
in the American School Board Journal
in 2009 titled “5 Reasons to Quit Whining About Tenure”, offered this
suggestion; “Identify your poorest-performing teachers and work with them” (5
Reasons). The article goes on to suggest such methods as regular evaluations
and coaching, providing the teacher with a mentor, and offering professional
development (5 Reasons). These are all great ideas to help teachers who are new
and might just need that extra push to get where they need to be. Everyone has
room for improvement, and given the right tools, teachers who are struggling
may be able to overcome the difficulties of those first few years on the job.
As the article states, “The worst that can happen: The teacher doesn’t improve,
you have invaluable documentation for a termination hearing, or maybe the
teacher will see the handwriting on the wall- and quit” (5 Reasons).
“Schools take the path of least
resistance by allowing the mere passage of time to automatically affirm a
teacher’s abilities. Teachers receive tenure by default in the absence of a finding
of gross incompetence” (Chesley). This is a trend that needs to be stopped. We
should not be allowing teachers tenure merely because they managed to “stick it
out” for a few years. Principals and other administrators must put the effort
in to make the changes necessary to ensure that all schools are filled with
competent, wonderful, and caring teachers who have a natural passion for
helping others. “Now is the ideal time for educators to redefine the concept of
tenure. Principals can establish a culture in which granting tenure is not the
mindless, default position” (Chesley).
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Journal #7
This is my third time watching the movie Waiting For Superman, and this is the third time it has brought me to tears. The first time I saw the movie, it made me question my decision to become a school teacher. The second time I saw it, it did just the opposite. It made me that much more confident that this is what I want and NEED to do with my life. The way I see it, if I can become a good or even a great teacher, then I can do my part in helping the future of our children and of our nation as a whole.
One part of the movie that really got to me was the children waiting to see if they got into schools based on a lottery. Seeing the sadness and disappointment on the faces of their mothers, fathers, and grandparents was very hard. I could not imagine being in a position such as theirs. Having to sit back while my child got less than they deserved would be unbearable. The fact that this country can not fix its broken education system is appalling.
Perhaps the most disturbing part of the movie was that about tenure. I think it is ridiculous that teachers are granted tenure just for "continuing to breathe for 2 years" (Waiting For Superman). As the movie pointed out, teaching is not a right, it is a privilege. If teachers are not doing their very best and helping children grow and learn, they should lose their jobs. Most other jobs, if you are doing a bad job, you will be fired. Why is this not the case for teachers? By allowing tenure we are telling lazy and incompetent teachers that "its OK, you can still have your job", when they do not deserve it.
One part of the movie that really got to me was the children waiting to see if they got into schools based on a lottery. Seeing the sadness and disappointment on the faces of their mothers, fathers, and grandparents was very hard. I could not imagine being in a position such as theirs. Having to sit back while my child got less than they deserved would be unbearable. The fact that this country can not fix its broken education system is appalling.
Perhaps the most disturbing part of the movie was that about tenure. I think it is ridiculous that teachers are granted tenure just for "continuing to breathe for 2 years" (Waiting For Superman). As the movie pointed out, teaching is not a right, it is a privilege. If teachers are not doing their very best and helping children grow and learn, they should lose their jobs. Most other jobs, if you are doing a bad job, you will be fired. Why is this not the case for teachers? By allowing tenure we are telling lazy and incompetent teachers that "its OK, you can still have your job", when they do not deserve it.
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Beauty Pageants: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly
Beauty
pageants have gained much attention recently as such shows as “Toddler and Tiaras”
and “Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo” have gained popularity. While pageants that
judge participants on their beauty have been around since the ancient times, the
first Miss America Pageant was held in 1921 in Atlantic City in an effort to
make tourists stay past Labor Day (PBS). Since then, the face of pageants has
changed, and not for the better. Contestants are becoming younger and younger
and the stakes are higher. While some would argue that beauty pageants help
build girls’ self-confidence and positive self-image, they are far more
damaging to young children. Participants in these types of pageants are more
likely to develop body image issues as well as unhealthy ideas about their
worth. For these reasons, beauty pageants for young girls should be stopped.
An article by Andrea Canning on ABCnews.com reports that
an “estimated 250,000 children compete in more than 5,000 pageants in the
United States each year” (ABC). Upon viewing the website for the Royal
International Miss pageant, it can be seen that there are many supporters for
children in pageants. Glancing through the photos of these children painted up
like dolls was a little disturbing. Perhaps the most fascinating part of the
website that I found was their mission statement.
“Empowering
young women while giving them the opportunity to grow and develop a positive
self-image is the focus of Royal International Miss Pageants. By providing
opportunities for young women and girls to cultivate their talents and public
speaking abilities, we help facilitate self-confidence” (Royal).
It
is clear that the supporters of such pageants are in agreement that these types
of competitions among children are healthy and can only have positive outcomes.
There is much research, however, that point to the contrary.
Body image is the way we feel about
how we look. For young girls, developing a positive body image can have many
benefits. Girls who are happy with the way they look are less likely to have
eating disorders, less likely to suffer from depression, and more likely to
develop positive and healthy relationships both in their teen and adult lives
(Psychology Today). A study done by Costal Caroline University in South
Caroline on the correlation between beauty pageants and eating disorders
revealed some startling results. Out of 131 female beauty pageant contestants,
over 26% had shown signs of an eating disorder. The average age at which these
problems began was 16 (NCBI). Depression is also higher for girls who
participate in such competitions. When they do not win, they feel as though
they are not good enough the way that they are. This brings me to my next
topic, damage to the self-worth of these young girls.
Self-worth is defined as the value
we place on ourselves as human beings. Beauty pageants and the messages they
convey say that all that is important about us is the way we look. “When it
comes to performing, education takes a back seat. The performers bodies are
their livelihood and less-than-perfect might lead to unemployment”(PsychologyToday).
It is this message that is damaging to our society’s young girls. We should be
encouraging young women to expand their minds and better themselves through
education. Beauty will fade, but intelligence is something no one can ever take
from you. The fact that so much pressure is put on girls to always look their
best is a tragedy.
As the mother of young daughter, it
is my hope that one day the attitudes toward women will change. With such an abundance
of beauty pageants that claim to offer girls self-confidence and pride; this is
where we need to start making the changes. We need to teach young girls and
women that their value does not lie in their faces or bodies, but instead in
their minds.
Sources:
"Beauty Pageants
for Teens, Girls, Toddlers, & Women (State & National). N.p., n.d. Web.
09 Apr.
2013.
Cartwright, Martina M.
"Child Beauty Pageants: What Are We Teaching Our Girls?" Web log post. Psychology
Today. N.p., 12 Aug. 2011. Web. 01 Apr. 2013.
CANNING, ANDREA, and
JESSICA HOFFMAN. "On TLC's 'Toddlers & Tiaras,' Little Divas Make
Their Entrance." ABC News. ABC News Network, 21 July 2009.
Web. 09 Apr. 2013.
"People &
Events: Origins of the Beauty Pageant." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 02
Apr. 2013.
Thompson, SK.
"Result Filters." National Center for Biotechnology
Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 08 Sept. 2003. Web. 01
Apr. 2013.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)